If we are able to genetically alter seed to produce crops that will feed the world we have a moral obligation to do so! I do not like soft bread! We could start with cars and aeroplanes. To blindly talk of banning it is not just ill-informed, it is downright foolhardy.
Whether we cite religious, philosophical, scientific, or plain common-sense reasoning, any government which supports and promotes this type of experimentation on the human race, under such questionable and untested and objectionable conditions, does not deserve to be called a government of the people; for it has forsaken its responsibility to work for the best interests of every man, woman, and child rather than against it for the sake of some market share and illusory wealth.
Growing genetically manipulated crops releases genetic pollution into the wild. The document identifies international laws that HGM is inconsistent with and identifies 40 countries that prohibit it.
Working with another Harvard laboratory, that of antiaging specialist David Sinclairthey would extract immature egg cells that could be coaxed to grow and divide in the laboratory.
Adam, USA Genetic engineering is based on an outdated understanding of science. This article explains that the Genetic engineering should be banned conference called by scientists and ethicists to temporarily ban human germline engineering is really a ruse and that the the scientists really organized the conference to share tips on how to do it.
In the future, as Genetically Modified food will get more development, it will achieve further benefits to our agriculture, environment and human health. Also, new technology will permit us to create new plants and animals to solve the acute problems of hunger and malnuitrition in the modern world.
The precautionary principle should apply. It assumes that genetic engineering can be stopped, while it, just like all scientific research that has potential use, cannot, and will not be.
Nothing can be taken back if released into the environment. I would like to see more compassionate farming of animals, and more organic produce.
Such manipulation might narrow genetic diversity and thwart adaptations that would otherwise have been accomplished through evolution.
Michelle Brothers, UK Curiosity of the human mind knows no bounds. I think that the pharmaceutical industry has shown us during the last five decades what, in a negative way, chemicals produced and sold under the flag of compassion and ethics can do to people. In short, whichever way you look at it, genetic engineering is just another technology.
Parents would be influenced by genetic advertising from IVF clinics. The population should not be exposed to such incalculable risk.
It scares me that developments are just being developed for the sake of development and NOT for the sake of the world and its inhabitants. We now get this genes protein in both the source and target organism.
If it is mishandled, it would be a threat to all of us. Tilly predicted that the whole end-to-end technology—cells to stem cells, stem cells to sperm or egg and then to offspring—would end up being worked out first in animals, such as cattle, either by his lab or by companies such as eGenesis, the spinoff from the Church lab working on livestock.
That being the case, it would be better to endorse genetic engineering with tighter regulations rather than banning it altogether. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
Only about half the embryos will lead to live births, and of those that do, many could contain a mixture of cells with edited DNA and without. Thomas Schneeberger, Switzerland Genetic engineering offers tremendous potential benefits - like any new technology it just needs to be managed in an intelligent way.
However If research into genetic engineering is stopped I think we will lose a very valuable opportunity to develop new drugs and medical techniques that could potentially be an asset. GE food has not been shown to produce any benefits - not heartier crops, not more crops, not any real benefits, just tremendous dangers which may take ages to repair.
This choice will never be truly informed until consumers have a broader understanding of the issues.Genetic engineering should NOT be banned but at the same time, it should only go to a certain extent.
Some might say that should be from and ethical standpoint but by looking at that point of view, science would never have made any progress. Should Human Cloning be Banned?
essaysCloning is defined as a form of genetic engineering in which the DNA of a person, animal, plant, or even a bacterium is used to produce a perfect or near –perfect genetic replica of the original.
Genetic Engineering Should Not be Banned Genetic engineering is a hotly-debated topic. On the one hand, giant corporations, ambitious scientists and powerful politicians are pushing forward with projects they claim will benefit mankind, and on the other, public opinion, environmentalists and consumers' associations are concerned that these.
Leading authorities on each side of the issue will debate "Should the United States Ban Human Cloning and Genetic Engineering" Tuesday, May 6 at p.m. at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
The group arguing against the ban tactically avoided the issue of genetic “enhancement” and chose to focus on the uses of genetic engineering to treat rare but fatal diseases. Genetic engineering of babies should be banned.
The genetic engineering of babies should not be tolerated because it is unnatural. Although some genetic treatments might be acceptable if they can help cure disease, people should not be .Download